The Double Standard: Revised

If you’ve ever been told to leave out “I” in your school essays, you’re not alone. But have you noticed that a lot of professional writers use “I” all the time? It’s even common in published academic papers. So why are students told to avoid it like it’s a bad habit?

In one of my classes last semester, I lost points for using “I argue” in my introduction. Then, in a reading for the same class, the author did exactly that—in the first paragraph! That’s when I started wondering who these rules are really for.

Scholars, journalists, and essayists regularly use “I” to clarify their stance. In fact, many writing guides now encourage it when used appropriately. Julia Molinari, who writes about academic writing, points out that pretending the writer doesn’t exist is misleading. She says it hides the choices the author makes and gives a false sense of neutrality.

Kimberly N. Parker also explains that students are often shocked when they’re told they can use “I.” That shock shows how deep the rule runs in education. We’ve been taught that formal writing means impersonal writing, but professionals don’t follow that rule. They’ve just learned how to use “I” well.

So the problem isn’t with first-person writing—it’s with how it’s taught. Students aren’t shown how to use “I” with purpose. We’re just told to avoid it. And that doesn’t help us grow as writers.

It’s time we stop treating “I” like it ruins a paper. If professional writers are using it to strengthen their arguments, then students should be taught to do the same. The key is intention—not avoidance.

What about you?
Have you ever gotten conflicting messages about using “I” in your writing? What’s your take?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What The Experts Say About Using "I" In Writing

By now, you’ve probably noticed that I’m pretty passionate about pushing back on the “never use ‘I’” rule in writing. But it’s not just a personal opinion—it’s something backed up by research, too. Experts who study writing and composition are saying loud and clear: using “I” can be a good thing, and avoiding it might be doing more harm than good. Take Julia Molinari, for example. She’s a researcher who’s spent a lot of time thinking about how academic writing works. In her dissertation, she points out that banning “I” doesn’t make writing more neutral—it just hides the person behind the words. She writes, “An absence of personal pronouns does not guarantee objectivity; it simply obscures the writer’s presence.” In other words, pretending the writer doesn’t exist doesn’t actually make the argument more fair or factual—it just makes it less transparent. That made a lot of sense to me. I’ve read papers where the author avoids saying “I think” or “I believe,” but you can still tell it’s...
Read more

How Writing Rules Kill Creativity (And What We Can Do About It)

We’ve all heard them—those rigid writing rules that seem to follow us from middle school through college. Don’t start a sentence with “but.” Don’t end one with a preposition. And of course, don’t use “I.” At some point, writing becomes less about saying something meaningful and more about avoiding red marks from a teacher. The problem is, when you strip away a student’s voice, you often strip away their interest too. I remember writing assignments where I knew exactly what I wanted to say, but I couldn’t figure out how to say it “the right way.” The result was a watered-down version of my original idea, edited to sound formal and distant—because that’s what I thought academic writing had to be. Honestly, it felt like I was writing as someone else. Not only did this make writing harder, it made me care a lot less about what I was writing. Kimberly N. Parker touches on this in Bad Ideas About Writing when she describes how her students felt disconnected from their work. She writes tha...
Read more